Home » Posts tagged 'valeurs canadiennes'
Tag Archives: valeurs canadiennes
The last couple of posts, and this and the next post relate to how Canada and Québec’s issues, politics, societal concerns, and social spheres mutually effect each other. This is why we very much share a collective psyche in so many spheres (more which is shared than not). It is a symbiotic relationship.
The following is the second example of three where Québec and Canada are mutually, and currently (right now) influencing and shaping each other’s societal views and collective psyche (an “averaging out” and “melding” of the two, if you will).
This example examines a debate going on right now which involves reasonable accommodations. I have already sufficiently blogged on the question of reasonable accommodations, so there is little need for me to delve into the details of it again. If you wish to read up on the details, you can refer to a few past posts:
SERIES: MULTICULTURALISM AND INTERCULTURALISM (8 POSTS)
- ENG – Multiculturalism Redefined? (#179)
- ENG – Multiculturalism & Interculturalism: Lost in definition… (#180) – POST 1 OF 3
- ENG – Multiculturalism & Interculturalism: Sometimes a Headline-Maker (#181) – POST 2 OF 3
- ENG – Multiculturalism & Interculturalism: The discussion in Québec (#182)– POST 3 OF 3
- ENG – Where is Multiculturalism heading in the next year or two in Québec? (#183)
- FR – Le multiculturalisme redéfini? (#178)
- FR – Le Multiculturalisme & l’interculturalisme: Le concept expliqué (#186)– billet 1 sur 2
- FR – Le Multiculturalisme & l’interculturalisme: Des aspects controversés (#187)– billet 2 sur 2
The latest public debate regarding reasonable accommodations pertains to the wearing of Niqabs in public, or during the participation in / exercise of official government bureaucracy.
The debate started in Québec before it took off in the rest of Canada. The debate took flight in Québec in 2012 with issues surrounding the Chartes des valeurs..
Now that we’re in “unofficial” election mode for the 2015 Federal election, the debate has recently made the leap from Québec into the overall Canadian arena in the last few months (since the end of 2014). However, I do not believe the debate would have become mediatized or political elsewhere in Canada had the matters not already been issues in Québec. Federal pan-Canadian politicians, desirous of votes in Québec and elsewhere in Canada, have brought the debate into the full public Canadian arena (which perhaps would not have happened had certain high-profile federal politicians not got their fingers in it).
A mix of Middle-Eastern politics, current events and religious fundamentalism (which in my view should never have been mixed into the Niqab debate) has been capitalized upon by opportunistic politicians – and these completely unrelated matters have now somehow ended up being tied to a discussion regarding the wearing of the Niqab by the narrowest of minorities in Canada (perhaps involving only a few hundred individuals across the entire country).
Three posts ago, you saw how this debate is now entering the realm of federal political attack advertisements – in a very high-profile manner to say the least (click HERE to see one such ad against the Niqab, but be aware that there are others out there as well).
Generally speaking, for many Canadians, this is the first time they have come face-to-face with this specific debate. Thus, for many in the country, they are still in the learning stage regarding the issue at hand (many, perhaps most, did not even know what a Niqab was until certain politicians decided this would be an election issue). This has therefore left a huge “public understanding gap” which a number of politicians are capitalizing on. These politicians have insinuated to the public that current (violent) Middle-Eastern events and / or “anti-Canadian values” can be tied to wearing the Niqab in a Canadian context, and thus they have filled the public misunderstanding gap with an emotional “plug” (regarding citizenship ceremonies, appropriate dress at court, what is “comfortable” clothing in a public space, what symbols are to be associated with radicalization, and even terrorism [Yikes! Seriously??], etc.).
A few provincial Québec politicians and parties (four parties in Québec to be precise; 1 federal party (the BQ), 3 provincial parties in Québec (the PQ, QS &ON) have been flogging the Niqab issue for three years. It was only because some Federal politicians only recently saw that this was a debate upon which could be capitalized on (following Québec’s example), that this was brought into the Canadian arena as a whole — primarily by the Conservative party
(Note: I am not making a political statement as to whether or not I support the Conservative party overall… I am merely stating that it is a fact that the Conservative Party has brought this issue into the public arena).
The Conservatives have tried their hand at this debate with the rest of Canada, they have crafted their own messaging, and it is now dividing aspects of the Canadian population, and perhaps is paying political dividends (big sigh).
I also know that this issue is dividing certain Conservatives and even Liberals within their own respective parties — right across the country (I have friends in both parties, and people in both parties seem to be torn over the issue, and how it has been politicized). This division within each respective party was perhaps an unintended and unexpected by-product of the debate. But it is also a division which is very present in Québec as well. It is being talked about across the country, and it has now become a Canadian debate in this respect, rather than just a Québec debate (regardless if one is Francophone or Anglophone).
However… my personal feeling is that most Canadians feel that this should not be a public debate, and are rather indifferent to the issue (even if they vote Conservative), despite the attention it is garnering. A perfect indication of this: An election was called in Alberta today for later in May (Canada’s most big “C” Conservative province, and the province where I grew up, and in which much of my family still lives)… and this appears to NOT to be a matter which any Alberta provincial politician wishes to capitalize upon as an election issue (be it Progressive Conservative, Liberal, NDP or Wildrose). I think that says a lot (and I also know many people in Québec who had wished this issue never surfaced in Québec either).
Nonetheless, on the Federal scene, I’m guessing this one debate alone has occupied 15%-20% of the Federal election-issue debate for the first third of 2015 (perhaps even 25% or higher). I personally feel that this is quite sad if these numbers are anywhere close to being accurate; what a waste of precious electoral debate time, especially when there are way more important issues to debate. On the other hand, perhaps it is a good thing that this is being debated… if for nothing else, than to get this debate over with as quickly as possible, and to bury this issue once and for all as a question of public debate; both provincially in Québec, and Federally across Canada. Time will tell what the outcome will be.
If you have never “met” someone who wears a Niqab, I strongly urge you to have a look at the following 25 minute video interview in the CBC article below.
It is an interview with a very well educated businesswoman / entrepreneur who wears the Niqab (does that in itself peak your curiosity??). This interview might help you to understand this Niqab issue better (I wish we saw many more video interviews like this, especially in French and in Québec… where I have so far seen no interviews of this nature to date).
Within the first 24 hours, the above CBC article and interview garnered 2500 comments. I personally cannot remember the last time that I have ever seen a CBC website article accumulate 2500 comments in such a short period of time (I have been reading the CBC news online on an almost daily basis for over a decade, and I have actually never ever seen any of their articles garner 2500 comments). I think that shows just how strongly people across the country feel about the issue — either in support of the person in the video, or against the wearing of the Niqab under certain conditions.
That is precisely why certain political parties are so quick to capitalize on the question, and turn this into an election issue; a perfect example of how Québec’s political and societal debates and sphere also affects the rest of Canada – coast-to-coast.
The next post will provide an example of a public debate which is just starting to gain momentum in English Canada, which has the potential to become a significant issue, and which has the potential to make a jump from English Canada to Québec.
The last post was an introduction for this and the next two posts. In the past post and the next two posts, let us explore how Québec’s (and Canada’s) relationship is one of symbiotic evolution.
All provinces have a role to play in our country’s symbiotic relation. However the nature of Québec gives it a unique role in this evolution – to the extent that I am certain Canada and its people would not have been the same in the absence of this relationship. Likewise, Québec and its people would not have been the same in the absence of this relationship.
The following example is one in which the overall Canadian context is currently (right now) influencing Québec’s own internal public policy & collective or public psyche.
Québec, like a number of other provinces is currently undergoing a period of hard fiscal restraint (some call it “austerity”, but I am not sure austerity would be the correct word — at least not in the sense of what we have seen in certain European countries over the past seven years).
Nonetheless, this is currently a hot-button issue (as it usually is).
In Alberta, the “Progressive Conservative” government recently implemented what could stereotypically be viewed as a “Liberal” budget (oil prices tanked, but despite a severe drop in oil revenue, Alberta wants to take a cautious, slow approach to eliminating their deficit until it becomes clear what direction the economy will take over the next two or three years).
Yet, in Québec the “Liberal” government has recently implemented what could stereotypically be called a “Progressive Conservative” budget (the current government is making fast and deep cuts, eliminating a massive deficit in a little over one year. They’re doing so because they already know where the province would financially sit in the absence of such cuts).
I am certain that both provinces (Alberta and Québec) would have drawn from to past Federal, Alberta, and Ontario experiences from the 1990s and 2000s when trying to decide how best to navigate their current difficult cash-flow realities. They also would have compared each other’s situations with those of other provinces when trying to guess where they would be in a few years.
Our provinces have a habit of sharing best practices.
Considering our provinces basically share the same systems, I would not be at all surprised if Québec consulted other provinces to learn from their own budgetary experiences to seek out best practices. This would take out a great deal of the guess work, and would allow Québec to implement fiscal and structural changes which worked for other provinces, and which worked without “harming” the system. Areas where there could have been consultations likely would have been regarding the consolidation of health administration structures, the fusion of education districts, the balancing of tax changes etc. – all which have (successfully) occurred in other provinces, and some of which appear to have been copied in Québec.
In my view, learning from the lessons of other provincial budgetary exercises is a broad type of Canadianization. It simply makes sense that our current provincial governments would look at how other parts of Canada have handled similar issues when deciding how best to deal with present regional / provincial issues. This is all-the-more important considering that our political and economic systems are generally the same at their core, regardless of what province we reside in.
But frankly speaking, I don’t think we should apply a party label to any budget. A government just needs to be practical and needs to look to past Canadian experiences in order to determine the best route of the present (that’s why we have seen Liberal budgets which have both splurged and slashed, PC budgets which have both splurged and slashed, and a very mixed bag from NDP governments).
The fact that one jurisdiction tends to learn from another is where I believe Canada, as a Federal State, has a HUGE advantage over “unitary” countries (like Italy, the UK, France, Portugal, Japan, etc.). We have 10 provinces, 3 territories, and one federal government which, in our highly decentralized environment, operate quite autonomously on many fronts. Within the span of 5 years, each of these 14 relatively autonomous jurisdictions will have at least one election cycle. Thus, within only 5 short years, as a country we have 14 times the amount of government budgetary experiences from which to draw from – from which to find “best practices” — and from which to implement the best-of-the-best as we continue to move forward.
Compare this with “unitary” countries. “Unitary” countries only have one election cycle and only one government within a 5 year span. Thus, they have no other “best-practice” examples from which to draw from within the confines of their own economic, governmental and social systems.
One short side-note in closing: Unfortunately our “local” media generally does not report on the budgetary successes of other provinces when reporting on local budgetary exercises. Local media will often be more apt to criticize local budgetary exercises without pointing out how the same measures have worked elsewhere. It’s unfortunate – especially when there is a language barrier. Take from that what you will. But then again, I am an advocate for bilingualism, which allows for light to be shed on these issues — and for a better informed, well-rounded perspective.
The next couple of posts will provide additional examples of our current symbiotic evolution in action.
This post covers a few general thoughts form my trip back to AB the last couple of weeks. It’s funny what I’ve noticed in Alberta when keeping my blog in the back of my mind. The following few observations may be of general interest to Francophone followers of my blog in Québec.
Ceci est le premier billet dans une série de quelques pensées qui découlent de mon temps en Alberta ces dernières deux semaines.
Ce n’est pas chaque jour que je rentre en Alberta et en Saskatchewan. Pourtant, peu importe où je vivais au monde, je faisais l’effort d’y rentrer au moins une fois par année depuis 2002 (parfois deux, parfois plus). Mais depuis mon retour au Canada il y a 14 mois, au moins le temps de mes vols de retour se sont raccourcis et ne sont qu’une durée de quatre à cinq heures de l’est du pays – ce qui est bien mieux que les maudits vols de 24 heures (correspondances comprises) que je faisais pendant plus qu’une décennie passé en outremer (vous n’avez aucune idée comment je suis devenu tanné de faire un si longue parcours à une ou deux reprises chaque année si je voulais tout simplement voir mes amis et ma famille pendant quelques jours. Ça faisait pour un voyage de fou, et parfois j’avais le sentiment de vouloir juste rester sur place).
Au Canada, et surtout au Québec, j’ai l’impression qu’on a tendance à croire qu’un vol de 4, 5, ou 6 heures (le temps qu’il faut pour prendre l’avion de Montréal à destination des villes de l’ouest du pays) serait aussi pénible et l’équivalent d’un vol de 14 à 20 heures jusqu’à l’autre côté du monde. C’est un sentiment que je comprends bien, car lorsqu’on n’a pas de proches ou des responsabilités à l’autre bout pour nous accueillir, cette distance pourrait paraitre aussi loin que d’aller à mars. Mais c’est un sentiment qui empêche trop de monde de ne pas faire le saut et de ne pas voyager ailleurs au Canada.
Mais croyez-moi lorsque je vous dis qu’un tel parcours n’est absolument rien du tout en termes de défi. C’est cinq heures de route de Gatineau à Québec… ce n’est rien ça, rien du tout! Dans cinq heures de vol de Montréal ou de Québec, vous pourriez être déjà à Régina ou à Calgary dans ce temps-là. Et avec ça, vous n’avez rien du tout à craindre… pas de violence, pas de guerre, pas de peur de tomber malade, et le tout fonctionne de la même mannière qu’au Québec.
Une fois, il y a quelques années, j’ai fait tourner un globe de table au hasard, et avec les yeux fermés j’ai mis le doigt dessus pour l’arrêter en me disant que j’irai où il arrête – sans discussion ou hésitation. J’ai ensuite acheté un billet d’avion pour aller ou mon doigt l’a arrêté, et trois jours plus tard j’étais à bord d’un avion à destination de… l’Indonésie! Aussi simple que ça! Alors, à mon avis, si un tel voyage à l’autre bout de notre pays est davantage plus simple, pourquoi ne pas le faire? Qu’est-ce qui vous empêche de la faire? Oui, de voyager à l’intérieur du Canada coûte plus cher que d’aller aux É-U, les Caraïbes ou l’Amérique centrale. Mais il y a des façons de le faire avec des bouts de ficelle, sans avoir toujours le sentiment inconfortable au-dessus de la tête d’un voyage de budget broche à foin.
Une fois sur place, le prix de louer une voiture pourrait être aussi bas que $35 par jour (et la taxe de vente n’est que 5% en Alberta car il n’y a pas de taxe provinciale). Il est super facile de trouver des hôtels à très bas prix si on s’écarte un peu des centres-ville. Une fois rendu, le prix total pourrait être réduit encore de moitié (ou même plus) si on se replie aux charcuteries des supermarchés plutôt que les restaurants (d’au moins quelques fois par semaine). Grosso modo, c’est tout pour bien dire qu’il existe des tas de moyens pour le faire marcher et s’y rendre.
Mon premier voyage dans l’est du pays à 17 ans (un vol d’Edmonton à Montréal) a été assez novice et très révélateur. Mais un tel vol aujourd’hui ne me ferait même pas cligner les yeux, car avec le temps, les villes comme Montréal, Toronto, et Québec me sont devenus aussi familières que Winnipeg, Saskatoon et Edmonton. Elles sont toutes devenues partie de mon chez moi, de ma vie, et de ma patrie. Nos horizons s’ouvrent, notre place dans le monde se définie, et on apprend de quelle étoffe on vient.
C’est ça de voyager à l’intérieur de son propre pays. Si on voyage dans une place telle la Chine, l’Inde, la France ou les É-U on sait que ce n’est pas notre pays – on le ressent, c’est palpable. Leurs systèmes sont différents, l’éducation des gens est différente, les expériences de vie et les défis de société sont différents, l’interaction entre les gens est différente. Mais ici, malgré les quelques différences qui distinguent les provinces l’une à l’autre, on partage quand-même l’essence des qualités que je viens de mentionner. Pourtant, on ne le constaterait jamais cette commonalité et héritage partagé si on ne fait pas le saut; si on n’embarque pas dans son char, ou si on persiste d’inventer des prétextes pour ne pas prendre l’avion.
Faites le saut! Croyez-moi, c’est simple comme bonjour.
Je vous écris de l’aéroport d’Edmonton. J’ai mon vol de retour à Toronto dans quelques minutes. À très bientôt!